"Schools are putting litter boxes in bathrooms for kids who identify as cats."
They're putting litter boxes in schools for people who identify as cats.Rep. Lauren Boebert, Mesa County, Colorado, October 2022. At least 20 Republican candidates and officials made the same claim that year.
There has never been a litter box in an American school for a student who identifies as a cat. Every district named by a politician was asked and every one said no. NBC News counted at least 20 conservative candidates and officials repeating it in the 2022 midterms; a Nebraska state senator repeated it on the floor of the legislature and apologized the same afternoon when his staff could not find a school. The claim's only physical basis is a bucket of cat litter that one Colorado district keeps in classrooms as an emergency toilet for lockdowns during school shootings.
No school, no district, no state education department has ever produced one. The people who said it either retracted, could not name a school, or named one that denied it.
How it spread
The kernel
- Jefferson County, Colorado stocks classroom "go buckets" with cat litterAlongside candy for diabetic students, wet wipes and a map: an emergency toilet for a lockdown. Since 2017.
- Furries existTeenagers who like anthropomorphic animal characters. NBC asked one. She had never heard of anyone wanting a litter box.
The myth
- That any school provides litter boxes for students
- That schools recognize students as cats, or let them come in costume
- That this is tied to transgender students or policiesThe claim was built as a slippery-slope argument: if schools accept trans kids, next they'll accept cats.
Dig deeper: anatomy of the hoax
The modern version starts with a December 21, 2021 school board meeting in Midland, Michigan, where a resident said she was "furious" to learn litter boxes had been placed in a unisex bathroom. She had been told this by someone. The superintendent checked and said there had never been one. The Michigan Republican Party's co-chair shared the video anyway in January 2022, Libs of TikTok amplified it, and within three months it had been repeated by legislators in Nebraska, Iowa and Minnesota, each naming a different school, each school denying it.
By the fall it was a campaign line. Marjorie Taylor Greene said it at a Trump rally on September 3; Colorado's Republican nominee for governor said students were "identifying as cats" on September 26 and, pressed for evidence, pointed to Jefferson County's lockdown buckets; Minnesota's nominee for governor, New Hampshire's nominee for Senate and Lauren Boebert all repeated it in October. Joe Rogan told it on a podcast October 13 and said three weeks later that there was no proof. Tony Dungy tweeted it in January 2023 and apologized.
The pattern is the point. Nobody who repeated the claim had seen a litter box. Each repetition cited the one before. When officials went looking (a Hannibal, Missouri superintendent checked every bathroom in the district in June 2022), they found nothing, and the finding never traveled as far as the claim. Candidates who leaned on it lost in New Hampshire, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota and Maine; the members of Congress who repeated it won.
The claim has since been exported to Canada, Scotland, Wales, New Zealand and Australia, where school authorities have issued the same denials, and it has been turned into legislation: an Oklahoma bill in 2024 and a Texas "FURRIES Act" in 2025 to ban non-human behavior in schools, both aimed at a problem no school has reported.
"Doctors are chemically and surgically mutilating thousands of children."
Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical MutilationTitle of Executive Order 14187, signed January 28, 2025. The order defines "children" as anyone under 19.
The numbers exist, because insurers keep them. In 2019, among 22.8 million insured Americans aged 17 and under, 85 had a gender-related surgery. Nearly all were 15 to 17 and 96% were chest procedures. Nobody 12 or younger had one. Over five years, among 5.2 million privately insured 8-to-17-year-olds, fewer than 8,000 started puberty blockers and about 16,000 started hormones nationally, about four and eight a day in a country of 26 million teenagers. The authors call even that an overestimate. The care is rare, it is almost entirely adolescents, it is almost never surgical, and it is now illegal for minors in 27 states anyway.
"Thousands" of surgeries is off by more than an order of magnitude. Genital surgery on minors is close to nonexistent in the data. The real numbers describe hundreds of chest surgeries a year on older teens and a few thousand adolescents a year on medication, under parental consent and specialist care.
The kernel
- Some 15-to-17-year-olds do get chest surgeryA few hundred a year nationally, with parental consent, after a diagnosis and specialist referral. The numbers rose from 2016 to 2021.
- Puberty blockers and hormones are real medical interventions with real tradeoffsFertility, bone density and the quality of the long-term evidence are legitimately debated among doctors; the May 2025 HHS review rated the evidence low, and so do many of the care's defenders.
The myth
- "Thousands" of surgeries on childrenInsured minors: 85 in 2019. Reuters' broader count: a few hundred a year, nearly all chest.
- Genital surgery on children56 cases nationally over three years among 13-to-17-year-olds, some likely miscoded. Zero under 13.
- Anything at all under 12Zero hormones, zero surgeries. Younger children who socially transition change names and clothes, not bodies.
- That it happens without parentsEvery clinic protocol in the country requires parental consent for minors.
Dig deeper: what the care actually is, and what 2025 changed
The ladder
Care for a transgender minor in the U.S. has four rungs, and almost everyone stops on the first. Social transition (a name, pronouns, clothes) involves no medicine. Puberty blockers, used for decades for early puberty, pause development at the start of adolescence; the national study found a rate of about 15 to 21 per 100,000 insured youths. Hormones (testosterone or estrogen) are typically started at 16 or later; the rate peaks at 17-year-olds, around 82 to 140 per 100,000. Surgery is rare before 18 and essentially limited to chest procedures on 15-to-17-year-olds.
The real debate
Serious people disagree about the second and third rungs. Britain's Cass Review (2024) and the U.S. HHS review (May 2025) both found the evidence base for blockers and hormones in adolescents to be low quality and urged caution; the HHS report went further, recommending psychotherapy over medication, and the major U.S. medical associations rejected it. That is a dispute about evidence standards and how to weigh risks for a small number of adolescents. It is not a dispute about whether thousands of children are being surgically altered, which no dataset supports.
What changed in 2025 and 2026
Executive Order 14187 told agencies to cut research and education funding to hospitals providing the care and directed HHS to use Medicare and Medicaid rules against it; hospitals in Washington, Virginia, Colorado and elsewhere paused care within days, and by 2026 even hospitals in states without bans, such as Baystate in Massachusetts, had stopped under threat of losing federal funding. The Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban in United States v. Skrmetti on June 18, 2025, which effectively secured the other 26 state bans. Six states make providing the care a felony. Half of American transgender teenagers now live where the care is illegal for them.
"Your kid goes to school and comes home a few days later with a sex change."
Your kid goes to school and comes home a few days later with an operation. The school decides what's going to happen with your child.Donald Trump, Moms for Liberty summit, August 30, 2024, repeated at rallies through October. Asked for an example, the campaign could not provide one. Moms for Liberty's co-founder conceded it was false and said she was "thankful" he raised it.
No school in the United States has ever performed, arranged or sent a child to a gender surgery. Schools cannot prescribe aspirin without a parent's signature. The medical version of the claim is simply invented. What is real, and what the claim is built on top of, is a fight over whether a school must tell parents when a student asks to use a different name or pronouns at school. That fight is about social transition, which involves no medicine, and it is being decided in fifteen state legislatures and, as of March 2026, at the Supreme Court.
Zero documented cases, ever, of a school providing or arranging medical transition. The underlying policy dispute, parental notification of a student's chosen name, is real and is listed below as the kernel.
The kernel
- Some districts adopted policies not to tell parents a student's chosen name without the student's consentFramed as safety for kids with hostile homes. California's AB 1955 (2024) barred districts from requiring the opposite. Opponents call this "secret transition."
- Social transition at school can precede a family conversationThat is the real dispute: who gets told, and when. It involves names and pronouns, not medicine.
The myth
- Any surgery, any hormone, any blocker, provided by or through a school
- "A few days later"Surgery for a minor, where it happens at all, follows years of diagnosis, specialist referral, parental consent and insurer approval.
- "The school decides"No U.S. jurisdiction lets a school consent to medical care for a minor.
Dig deeper: the notification fight, honestly
The real policy question is narrow and hard. A 14-year-old asks a teacher to use a new name. Does the school tell the parents? Fifteen states now say yes in at least some circumstances (seven on any disclosure to staff, six before staff may use the name, two when a parent asks). Thirty-five do not require it, and some districts in those states have policies against disclosure without the student's consent, reasoning that a student who is not safe at home should not be outed by the school. California made that the statewide rule in 2024; a conservative legal group challenged it, and the Supreme Court paused the law in March 2026 while the case proceeds. The Trump administration separately found in January 2026 that California's policy violated federal parental-records law.
Reasonable people land in different places on this, and polls show parents want to be told. What the claim does is take that disagreement about a name on a roster and describe it as a surgery. The gap between the two is the whole distance between a school policy debate and a child's body.
"Men are taking over women's sports."
Keeping Men Out of Women's SportsTitle of Executive Order 14201, February 5, 2025. The NCAA changed its policy to match it the next day.
Asked under oath in December 2024 how many transgender athletes compete in college sports, the NCAA's president said "less than 10," out of 510,000. There is no national count for high schools; the handful of known cases, a California high jumper, a Washington sprinter, two athletes in Maine, each became a national news story precisely because they were so rare. In the same period 29 states passed bans, the President issued an executive order, and the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on June 30, 2026 that states may keep girls' teams for "biological females." The claim describes a takeover. The data describe fewer than ten people and seventy-odd laws.
Transgender women have competed in women's categories and a few have won, including an NCAA title in 2022. The physiology question is genuinely contested by sports scientists. "Taking over" is not: the known number is in the single digits nationally at the college level.
The kernel
- Transgender women have wonThomas's 2022 title; a California high school triple-jump and high-jump champion in 2025; a Washington 400-meter champion. Each case is real and each was contested by competitors.
- Male puberty confers physical advantages that hormone therapy does not fully reverseSports scientists disagree about how much and for which sports; the IOC left it to each federation; many federations now restrict by puberty.
- Most Americans want birth-sex categories69% in Gallup's 2025 poll, including 42% of Democrats.
The myth
- "Men"The athletes in question are transgender girls and women, most of whom transitioned before or during puberty and compete under hormone rules.
- "Taking over"Fewer than ten of 510,000 college athletes; a handful of high school cases nationally; one Division I title in NCAA history.
- The Olympic boxerImane Khelif, the Algerian boxer called a man by Trump and others in 2024, was born female, raised female and has a female passport. She is not transgender; the IOC said so and no evidence of a sex-development condition was ever produced.
Dig deeper: the cases, the science, and the laws
The documented cases
Lia Thomas swam for Penn's women's team in 2021–22 after three seasons on the men's team and a year of hormone therapy under NCAA rules; she won the 500 free at nationals, placed fifth in the 200 and last in the 100 final. Penn later settled a Title IX complaint with the Trump administration by stripping her records. At the high school level the known cases are counted in ones: AB Hernandez won California's girls' high jump and triple jump in 2025 under a rule change that awarded duplicate medals; a Spokane Valley runner won a 400-meter title in Washington; Maine's governor said the state had two transgender girls in school sports when the administration moved to cut the state's funding over them. Advocacy groups keep lists of trans athletes who placed; the lists are short, and most entries are not champions.
The science
Testosterone during male puberty increases height, muscle mass, heart and lung size and bone density. Hormone therapy reduces muscle mass and hemoglobin over one to three years but does not reverse skeletal differences. How much residual advantage remains, and whether it matters in a given sport, is contested in the literature; the honest summary is "some, sport-dependent, and smaller for athletes who never went through male puberty." That argument is about eligibility rules for a handful of people. It does not support the word "takeover."
The laws
Idaho passed the first ban in 2020. By October 2026 there were 27 state laws and two agency policies (Alaska, Virginia). The NCAA barred athletes assigned male at birth from women's teams on February 6, 2025, the day after the executive order. On June 30, 2026 the Supreme Court held that Idaho's and West Virginia's laws violate neither the Equal Protection Clause nor Title IX; Justice Kavanaugh wrote that states "may maintain women's and girls' sports for biological females," and Justice Sotomayor's dissent objected that the laws apply even where an individual athlete has no advantage. Voters in Arizona, Colorado, Nebraska and Washington decide ballot measures on the question in November 2026.
"Letting trans people use the bathroom puts women and girls in danger."
Men in women's bathroomsThe standard phrasing in 21 state bathroom laws passed since 2021, and in the campaign ads that preceded them.
The claim has been tested. Massachusetts localities adopted transgender-inclusive restroom rules at different times, which let researchers compare police reports for assault, voyeurism and privacy violations in restrooms before and after, and against similar towns without the rules. There was no change. Incidents of any kind in restrooms were rare everywhere. What the national crime survey does show is who gets hurt: transgender people are victims of violent crime at four times the rate of everyone else.
The one natural experiment found no effect on safety or privacy incidents. No state that passed a bathroom law has produced data showing the problem it was solving.
The kernel
- Women's restrooms and locker rooms are places where privacy matters and assaults, though rare, do occurEvery such assault is already a crime, by anyone, under every state's law.
- Some people are uncomfortable sharing facilities with transgender peopleDiscomfort is real; the laws are sold as safety, which is a different claim.
The myth
- That inclusive rules increase assaults or voyeurismThe Massachusetts study found no effect.
- That predators use trans-inclusive rules as coverNo documented pattern; a man entering a women's restroom to assault someone was illegal before and after.
- "Groomers"Drag story hours, Pride events and transgender teachers have never been linked by any dataset to abuse; the overwhelming majority of abusers are family members and trusted adults of the child's own community.
Dig deeper: the study, and what the laws actually do
The Williams Institute study (Hasenbush, Flores and Herman, 2018) used Massachusetts, where some cities adopted gender-identity public accommodation ordinances before the 2016 statewide law. It matched those localities to similar ones without ordinances and compared police reports of assault, sex crimes, voyeurism and other privacy violations in restrooms and locker rooms before and after. The passage of the ordinances "is not related to the number or frequency of criminal incidents in these spaces." Such incidents were rare in all localities. The authors note the obvious limit: it is one state and the incidents are too rare to detect small effects. It remains the only controlled test anyone has run, because no state passing a bathroom law has commissioned one.
The laws themselves range widely. Three states cover K-12 schools only; nine cover schools and some government buildings; nine, plus Puerto Rico, cover every government-owned building including universities; four make using the "wrong" facility a crime in some circumstances, and Idaho's 2026 law made it a felony. What they share is an enforcement problem: nobody checks, so in practice they are enforced by other users' suspicion, which falls on anyone who looks gender-nonconforming, including cisgender women. The one measurable effect in the data is on transgender people, who report avoiding public restrooms, and whose victimization rate is four times the average.
"Mass shooters are disproportionately transgender."
Trans/NB (Bio Male)Top line of a chart of "mass shootings per million" that went viral on X in late August 2025 after the Minneapolis church shooting, amplified by Donald Trump Jr. among others. No organization that tracks shootings produced it; the Gun Violence Archive's director said he had "no idea" where its numbers came from.
The Violence Project, the most-used database of mass shootings, counts 200 shooters from 1966 to 2024. One was transgender. One hundred and ninety-two were men. The Gun Violence Archive, using a broader definition that counts any shooting with four or more people hit, has about 5,750 incidents since 2013 and five confirmed transgender shooters, under 0.1%. Transgender people are about 1% of Americans 13 and older. By either database they are underrepresented among shooters, and men, at 96%, are the group that is not.
The viral chart had no source. Every real database shows the same thing: mass shooters are overwhelmingly men, and transgender shooters are a rounding error below their population share.
Dig deeper: why the claim recurs
The claim surfaces after specific shootings: Nashville in March 2023, Minneapolis in August 2025, and a British Columbia shooting in February 2026, each involving a perpetrator identified in reporting as transgender or nonbinary. Three cases in three years feel like a pattern to anyone who hears about them and never hears about the other 190. That is the mechanism of most of the claims on this page: a vivid case, a category, and no denominator. The denominator here is well documented. Of 200 Violence Project shooters, 192 were men who were not transgender; the FBI's 2023 active-shooter report listed 49 shooters, 48 of them men. Ohio State criminologist Laura Dugan's summary: relative to their population share, transgender people appear underrepresented. Several databases, including the AP/USA Today/Northeastern count, do not record gender identity at all, which is one reason the viral chart could not have been built from them.
"Most of them regret it and detransition."
Here come the detransitioner lawsuitsA recurring framing in opinion pages and state legislative hearings since 2023, where individual detransitioners have testified in support of bans.
Regret is real and the people who experience it deserve to be heard. It is also uncommon by every measure anyone has taken. Pooling 27 studies of 7,928 surgical patients, regret ran about 1%. Across the studies of adolescents on hormones, between 1.6% and 9.8% stop, and between 1% and 7.6% stop puberty blockers. The largest survey of people who detransitioned found that 82.5% cited an outside reason, pressure from family, harassment, losing a job, trouble getting care, rather than a change in identity. The numbers are contested at the edges, mainly over who drops out of studies, but no study supports "most."
Detransition exists and the research on it is thinner than it should be. "Most" is not supported by any study; the range runs from about 1% for surgical regret to under 10% for stopping hormones, and most who stop cite pressure rather than regret.
The kernel
- Some people detransition and some regret treatmentTheir testimony has shaped laws in several states and lawsuits against providers. Their numbers are small but not zero.
- Long-term follow-up is weakClinics lose track of patients; the "1%" figure comes from those who stayed in contact. The honest range for adolescents stopping hormones is single digits, with uncertainty.
The myth
- "Most"No study, including those by critics of the care, finds a majority.
- That detransition equals regretMost who stop cite family pressure, harassment or cost; many later resume.
- That surgery is commonly regrettedAbout 1% across 27 studies, lower than most elective surgeries.
Dig deeper: what the studies measure
Three different things get called "detransition." Regret is a stated wish not to have had treatment. Discontinuation is stopping medication, for any reason, including cost, side effects, pregnancy plans or reaching a desired point. Identity change is ceasing to identify as transgender. The 2021 meta-analysis of surgical regret (Bustos et al.) pooled 7,928 patients and found about 1%, with wide confidence intervals and the authors' own warning about inconsistent definitions; a published rebuttal argued one included study's sample was overstated. A 2025 systematic review of discontinuation found adolescent hormone discontinuation ranging from 1.6% to 9.8% across studies and blocker discontinuation from 1% to 7.6%. The 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey found 13.1% of respondents had detransitioned at some point, 82.5% of them citing at least one external reason; a separate survey recruited from online detransitioner communities found the opposite emphasis, with 70% citing a realization that their dysphoria had other causes. Both are self-selected samples. The fair reading is that detransition is a minority outcome measured in single-digit percentages, that the people who experience it are poorly served by both sides of the argument, and that nobody has the long-term data that would settle it.
"Democrats support abortion up to birth, and even after."
Execution after birth.Donald Trump, presidential debate, September 10, 2024, about Minnesota and its governor. The moderator corrected him on air: "There is no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it's born." Ron DeSantis made a similar claim in 2023; PolitiFact rated it False.
Killing a newborn is homicide in all fifty states and always has been. No bill anywhere proposes otherwise. The "after birth" claim grew out of laws in a few states that let families decline aggressive intervention for infants born with conditions that will kill them within minutes or hours, which is palliative care, not abortion. The "up to birth" half has a kernel: ten states and the District of Columbia set no gestational limit in law. But the thing the phrase conjures, healthy late-term pregnancies ended on request, is not what happens. The CDC's count: 1.1% of abortions occur at 21 weeks or later, and those are overwhelmingly fetal anomalies and threats to the mother's life.
"After birth" is false everywhere. "Up to birth" is legally possible in ten states and DC and describes about 1% of abortions, nearly all medical emergencies, which is why the phrase is a myth even where the statute is real.
The kernel
- Ten states and DC have no gestational limitAlaska, Colorado, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont. Most Democrats in Congress support codifying Roe, which allowed limits after viability.
- Some states repealed "born-alive" statutesMinnesota in 2023 replaced a requirement to resuscitate with a requirement for care "consistent with good medical practice," which allows comfort care for infants who cannot survive.
The myth
- "Execution after birth"Illegal in every state; no law or bill allows it.
- That late abortions are common or elective1.1% after 21 weeks, requiring a specialist, usually after a diagnosis that the fetus will not survive.
- "Democrats" as a blocDemocratic-led states range from no limit to viability limits; the party's federal bill restored Roe's viability framework.
"They're eating the pets. Immigrants are driving crime."
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats.Donald Trump, presidential debate, September 10, 2024. Springfield's city manager, police chief, mayor and county commission president said there was no evidence. The woman whose missing cat started one rumor found it in her basement and apologized to her Haitian neighbors.
The Springfield story was false the day it was told and has stayed false through every attempt to revive it; the one later animal-cruelty case cited as vindication involved a woman who was neither Haitian nor from Springfield. The larger claim behind it, that immigrants commit more crime, is the rare political claim that has been tested against hard records, because Texas logs the immigration status of everyone it arrests. The result is the same every year: undocumented immigrants are arrested and convicted at lower rates than people born here, and legal immigrants at lower rates still.
No pets. And in the only state that keeps the records, immigrants of every status are arrested, convicted and imprisoned less often than the native-born.
The kernel
- Springfield's Haitian population grew fast, to an estimated 15,000 in a city of 58,000Housing, schools and clinics were strained; the strain was real and the city said so. The pets were not.
- Individual immigrants commit crimes, some of them horrificEvery group's members do. The question the claim makes is about rates, and the rates run the other way.
The myth
- Anyone eating anyone's petOne missing cat, found in the owner's basement. One stolen-geese report the county found no evidence for.
- "Driving crime"Undocumented: about half the native-born rate. Legal immigrants: about a quarter.
- "Migrant crime wave"Violent crime fell nationally in 2023, 2024 and 2025 during the largest immigration surge in decades.
"Millions of noncitizens are voting."
Noncitizens are voting in our elections in massive numbers.The premise of the SAVE Act and of state "citizenship audits" in 2024 to 2026. The audits are the best evidence against the premise.
States that went looking found what every previous search found. Georgia checked 8.2 million registered voters in 2024 and found 20 noncitizens, nine of whom had ever voted, most before 2012. Michigan found 15 possible noncitizen ballots among 5.7 million cast. Utah reviewed two million registrations over a year and found 27 noncitizens registered. In thirty years of federal prosecutions, 129 people have been charged with voting as a noncitizen and 73 convicted. The crime carries prison and deportation, and the data show it is attempted at a rate of a few per million.
Every audit, including those run by Republican secretaries of state who expected to find fraud, found cases in the dozens against voter rolls in the millions.
The kernel
- Noncitizens have occasionally registered and votedDozens per state over decades, usually green-card holders confused at the DMV. It is a felony and they are prosecuted.
- A few cities let noncitizens vote in local electionsSan Francisco school board; some Maryland and Vermont towns. Never federal or state races, where it is illegal everywhere.
The myth
- "Millions," "massive," "swinging elections"The largest audit in the country found 20 people. The 2016 presidential margin in Georgia was 211,000 votes; in 2024, 115,000.
- That audits are suppressedRepublican officials in Georgia, Ohio, Texas and Utah ran them and published them. The numbers are above.
What the myths built.
Fewer than ten college athletes, 85 surgeries a year, zero litter boxes and no measurable bathroom risk produced, between 2020 and 2026, seventy-seven state laws and policies: 27 bans on medical care for transgender minors, 29 bans on transgender girls in school sports, and 21 bathroom restrictions. Switch layers to see where each applies. Half of American transgender teenagers now live where all three are law.
One vivid case, one category, no denominator.
Every claim on this page is built the same way. Take something that happened once, or never: a litter bucket, a swimmer, a missing cat, a chart with no source. Attach it to a category of people. Leave out the number that would show how rare it is. The listener fills in the rest, because a story about one child is more vivid than a table with 22.8 million in it. The correction, when it comes, is a denominator, and denominators do not travel.
Who took it back
Retractions are rare and worth recording. Nebraska State Senator Bruce Bostelman apologized on the floor the same day in March 2022. Maine congressional candidate Ed Thelander said he "doesn't believe it now" in October 2022. Joe Rogan said three weeks after repeating the litter-box story that there was no proof. Tony Dungy deleted his tweet and apologized in January 2023. NCAA president Charlie Baker, asked under oath, gave the real number. The woman in Springfield whose cat was in her basement apologized to her neighbors. The pattern among those who retracted: they were asked for a school, a name, a case, and looked.
How to check a claim in five minutes
- Ask for the denominatorOut of how many? A number without one is a story, not a rate.
- Ask who countedInsurers, the CDC, state auditors and crime surveys count. A chart with no source counts nothing.
- Ask for the school, the case, the nameEvery litter-box claim died at this step.
- Separate the policy from the claimYou can favor birth-sex sports categories and still know the number is under ten. You can oppose blockers and still know it is zero under 12.
- Notice the categoryWhen a claim is about what "they" do, the data are usually about what one person did.
What the claims have in common
- Each names a vulnerable group of children as either victims or threats
- Each arrived in an election year2022, 2024 and 2026.
- Each produced laws before it produced evidence77 state measures; one controlled study, which found nothing.
- Each is unfalsifiable by design"Somewhere," "they," "people are saying." The denominator is the only reply.
There are real debates inside these topics: how to weigh thin evidence for adolescent hormones, how to write eligibility rules for a sport, what a school owes a parent, where a gestational line belongs. Those debates deserve arguments. What they have gotten instead is a litter box. This page is not a position on any of them. It is the number you need before you can have one.