GOP Myths · an explainer · data through October 2026

Ten things you've been told about kids, trans people and immigrants.

Each one was said on a debate stage, in a campaign ad, or by a sitting official. Each one has a number attached to it somewhere, in a federal survey, an insurance database, a state audit or a court record. This page puts the claim next to the number. Where there is a kernel of truth, it says so. Where there isn't, it says that too.

Start with the litter boxes See what the myths built
0Litter boxes found in any school, after 20+ officials said otherwise
<10Transgender athletes among 510,000 in the NCAA, per its president
0Gender surgeries on children 12 and under, in 22.8 million insured kids
77State laws passed on the strength of these claims
§1 · The claim

"Schools are putting litter boxes in bathrooms for kids who identify as cats."

They're putting litter boxes in schools for people who identify as cats.Rep. Lauren Boebert, Mesa County, Colorado, October 2022. At least 20 Republican candidates and officials made the same claim that year.

There has never been a litter box in an American school for a student who identifies as a cat. Every district named by a politician was asked and every one said no. NBC News counted at least 20 conservative candidates and officials repeating it in the 2022 midterms; a Nebraska state senator repeated it on the floor of the legislature and apologized the same afternoon when his staff could not find a school. The claim's only physical basis is a bucket of cat litter that one Colorado district keeps in classrooms as an emergency toilet for lockdowns during school shootings.

False

No school, no district, no state education department has ever produced one. The people who said it either retracted, could not name a school, or named one that denied it.

How it spread

    The kernel

    • Jefferson County, Colorado stocks classroom "go buckets" with cat litterAlongside candy for diabetic students, wet wipes and a map: an emergency toilet for a lockdown. Since 2017.
    • Furries existTeenagers who like anthropomorphic animal characters. NBC asked one. She had never heard of anyone wanting a litter box.

    The myth

    • That any school provides litter boxes for students
    • That schools recognize students as cats, or let them come in costume
    • That this is tied to transgender students or policiesThe claim was built as a slippery-slope argument: if schools accept trans kids, next they'll accept cats.
    Dig deeper: anatomy of the hoax

    The modern version starts with a December 21, 2021 school board meeting in Midland, Michigan, where a resident said she was "furious" to learn litter boxes had been placed in a unisex bathroom. She had been told this by someone. The superintendent checked and said there had never been one. The Michigan Republican Party's co-chair shared the video anyway in January 2022, Libs of TikTok amplified it, and within three months it had been repeated by legislators in Nebraska, Iowa and Minnesota, each naming a different school, each school denying it.

    By the fall it was a campaign line. Marjorie Taylor Greene said it at a Trump rally on September 3; Colorado's Republican nominee for governor said students were "identifying as cats" on September 26 and, pressed for evidence, pointed to Jefferson County's lockdown buckets; Minnesota's nominee for governor, New Hampshire's nominee for Senate and Lauren Boebert all repeated it in October. Joe Rogan told it on a podcast October 13 and said three weeks later that there was no proof. Tony Dungy tweeted it in January 2023 and apologized.

    The pattern is the point. Nobody who repeated the claim had seen a litter box. Each repetition cited the one before. When officials went looking (a Hannibal, Missouri superintendent checked every bathroom in the district in June 2022), they found nothing, and the finding never traveled as far as the claim. Candidates who leaned on it lost in New Hampshire, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota and Maine; the members of Congress who repeated it won.

    The claim has since been exported to Canada, Scotland, Wales, New Zealand and Australia, where school authorities have issued the same denials, and it has been turned into legislation: an Oklahoma bill in 2024 and a Texas "FURRIES Act" in 2025 to ban non-human behavior in schools, both aimed at a problem no school has reported.

    §2 · The claim

    "Doctors are chemically and surgically mutilating thousands of children."

    Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical MutilationTitle of Executive Order 14187, signed January 28, 2025. The order defines "children" as anyone under 19.

    The numbers exist, because insurers keep them. In 2019, among 22.8 million insured Americans aged 17 and under, 85 had a gender-related surgery. Nearly all were 15 to 17 and 96% were chest procedures. Nobody 12 or younger had one. Over five years, among 5.2 million privately insured 8-to-17-year-olds, fewer than 8,000 started puberty blockers and about 16,000 started hormones nationally, about four and eight a day in a country of 26 million teenagers. The authors call even that an overestimate. The care is rare, it is almost entirely adolescents, it is almost never surgical, and it is now illegal for minors in 27 states anyway.

    Mostly false

    "Thousands" of surgeries is off by more than an order of magnitude. Genital surgery on minors is close to nonexistent in the data. The real numbers describe hundreds of chest surgeries a year on older teens and a few thousand adolescents a year on medication, under parental consent and specialist care.

    Gender-affirming surgeries · per 100,000 insured people, by age, 2019JAMA Network Open, 2024
    85 surgeries among 22.8 million insured minors; 2,664 among 47.4 million insured adults. Of the minors' procedures, 82 of 85 were chest surgeries. A separate insurance analysis by Reuters and Komodo Health counted 776 mastectomies and 56 genital surgeries among 13-to-17-year-olds with a gender dysphoria diagnosis nationwide across 2019 to 2021 combined.
    0children 12 or younger who received hormones or surgery in the five-year national study.JAMA Pediatrics, Jan 2025
    <8,000youths who started puberty blockers in five years, 2018 to 2022, nationally. About four a day.JAMA Pediatrics, 5.2M privately insured ages 8–17
    ~16,000who started hormones in the same five years. About eight a day, mostly 16- and 17-year-olds.JAMA Pediatrics
    27states plus Puerto Rico that now ban this care for minors. The Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban 6-3 in June 2025.MAP, Oct 2026

    The kernel

    • Some 15-to-17-year-olds do get chest surgeryA few hundred a year nationally, with parental consent, after a diagnosis and specialist referral. The numbers rose from 2016 to 2021.
    • Puberty blockers and hormones are real medical interventions with real tradeoffsFertility, bone density and the quality of the long-term evidence are legitimately debated among doctors; the May 2025 HHS review rated the evidence low, and so do many of the care's defenders.

    The myth

    • "Thousands" of surgeries on childrenInsured minors: 85 in 2019. Reuters' broader count: a few hundred a year, nearly all chest.
    • Genital surgery on children56 cases nationally over three years among 13-to-17-year-olds, some likely miscoded. Zero under 13.
    • Anything at all under 12Zero hormones, zero surgeries. Younger children who socially transition change names and clothes, not bodies.
    • That it happens without parentsEvery clinic protocol in the country requires parental consent for minors.
    Dig deeper: what the care actually is, and what 2025 changed

    The ladder

    Care for a transgender minor in the U.S. has four rungs, and almost everyone stops on the first. Social transition (a name, pronouns, clothes) involves no medicine. Puberty blockers, used for decades for early puberty, pause development at the start of adolescence; the national study found a rate of about 15 to 21 per 100,000 insured youths. Hormones (testosterone or estrogen) are typically started at 16 or later; the rate peaks at 17-year-olds, around 82 to 140 per 100,000. Surgery is rare before 18 and essentially limited to chest procedures on 15-to-17-year-olds.

    The real debate

    Serious people disagree about the second and third rungs. Britain's Cass Review (2024) and the U.S. HHS review (May 2025) both found the evidence base for blockers and hormones in adolescents to be low quality and urged caution; the HHS report went further, recommending psychotherapy over medication, and the major U.S. medical associations rejected it. That is a dispute about evidence standards and how to weigh risks for a small number of adolescents. It is not a dispute about whether thousands of children are being surgically altered, which no dataset supports.

    What changed in 2025 and 2026

    Executive Order 14187 told agencies to cut research and education funding to hospitals providing the care and directed HHS to use Medicare and Medicaid rules against it; hospitals in Washington, Virginia, Colorado and elsewhere paused care within days, and by 2026 even hospitals in states without bans, such as Baystate in Massachusetts, had stopped under threat of losing federal funding. The Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban in United States v. Skrmetti on June 18, 2025, which effectively secured the other 26 state bans. Six states make providing the care a felony. Half of American transgender teenagers now live where the care is illegal for them.

    §3 · The claim

    "Your kid goes to school and comes home a few days later with a sex change."

    Your kid goes to school and comes home a few days later with an operation. The school decides what's going to happen with your child.Donald Trump, Moms for Liberty summit, August 30, 2024, repeated at rallies through October. Asked for an example, the campaign could not provide one. Moms for Liberty's co-founder conceded it was false and said she was "thankful" he raised it.

    No school in the United States has ever performed, arranged or sent a child to a gender surgery. Schools cannot prescribe aspirin without a parent's signature. The medical version of the claim is simply invented. What is real, and what the claim is built on top of, is a fight over whether a school must tell parents when a student asks to use a different name or pronouns at school. That fight is about social transition, which involves no medicine, and it is being decided in fifteen state legislatures and, as of March 2026, at the Supreme Court.

    False

    Zero documented cases, ever, of a school providing or arranging medical transition. The underlying policy dispute, parental notification of a student's chosen name, is real and is listed below as the kernel.

    0examples the campaign could produce when CNN, AP and others asked for one.CNN fact check, Sept 2024
    15states whose laws require schools to tell parents when a student socially transitions, in some circumstances. 35 states do not require it.MAP, Oct 2026
    Mar 3, 2026The Supreme Court paused California's 2024 law barring districts from forcing teachers to out students, pending litigation.Mirabelli v. Bonta
    4 / dayyouths starting puberty blockers nationally, every one through a clinic with parental consent, none through a school.JAMA Pediatrics, 2025

    The kernel

    • Some districts adopted policies not to tell parents a student's chosen name without the student's consentFramed as safety for kids with hostile homes. California's AB 1955 (2024) barred districts from requiring the opposite. Opponents call this "secret transition."
    • Social transition at school can precede a family conversationThat is the real dispute: who gets told, and when. It involves names and pronouns, not medicine.

    The myth

    • Any surgery, any hormone, any blocker, provided by or through a school
    • "A few days later"Surgery for a minor, where it happens at all, follows years of diagnosis, specialist referral, parental consent and insurer approval.
    • "The school decides"No U.S. jurisdiction lets a school consent to medical care for a minor.
    Dig deeper: the notification fight, honestly

    The real policy question is narrow and hard. A 14-year-old asks a teacher to use a new name. Does the school tell the parents? Fifteen states now say yes in at least some circumstances (seven on any disclosure to staff, six before staff may use the name, two when a parent asks). Thirty-five do not require it, and some districts in those states have policies against disclosure without the student's consent, reasoning that a student who is not safe at home should not be outed by the school. California made that the statewide rule in 2024; a conservative legal group challenged it, and the Supreme Court paused the law in March 2026 while the case proceeds. The Trump administration separately found in January 2026 that California's policy violated federal parental-records law.

    Reasonable people land in different places on this, and polls show parents want to be told. What the claim does is take that disagreement about a name on a roster and describe it as a surgery. The gap between the two is the whole distance between a school policy debate and a child's body.

    §4 · The claim

    "Men are taking over women's sports."

    Keeping Men Out of Women's SportsTitle of Executive Order 14201, February 5, 2025. The NCAA changed its policy to match it the next day.

    Asked under oath in December 2024 how many transgender athletes compete in college sports, the NCAA's president said "less than 10," out of 510,000. There is no national count for high schools; the handful of known cases, a California high jumper, a Washington sprinter, two athletes in Maine, each became a national news story precisely because they were so rare. In the same period 29 states passed bans, the President issued an executive order, and the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on June 30, 2026 that states may keep girls' teams for "biological females." The claim describes a takeover. The data describe fewer than ten people and seventy-odd laws.

    Kernel of truth

    Transgender women have competed in women's categories and a few have won, including an NCAA title in 2022. The physiology question is genuinely contested by sports scientists. "Taking over" is not: the known number is in the single digits nationally at the college level.

    <10transgender athletes the NCAA's president said he knew of, December 2024.Charlie Baker, Senate Judiciary testimony
    510,000NCAA athletes. One in fifty thousand, if the ten are all there are.NCAA
    One in 51,000 · each dot is 100 NCAA athletes5,100 dots; the transgender athletes are 0.1 of one dot
    The single highlighted dot represents 100 athletes. Fewer than ten transgender athletes would not fill a tenth of it.
    29states that bar transgender girls from girls' school sports: 27 by law, two by agency policy.MAP, Oct 11, 2026
    6–3Supreme Court vote upholding Idaho's and West Virginia's bans, June 30, 2026, with a unanimous holding that they do not violate Title IX.West Virginia v. B.P.J.
    69%of Americans say transgender athletes should compete according to birth sex, up from 62% in 2021.Gallup, May 2025
    1NCAA Division I title won by a transgender woman: Lia Thomas, 500-yard freestyle, 2022. She finished last in the 100.NCAA results

    The kernel

    • Transgender women have wonThomas's 2022 title; a California high school triple-jump and high-jump champion in 2025; a Washington 400-meter champion. Each case is real and each was contested by competitors.
    • Male puberty confers physical advantages that hormone therapy does not fully reverseSports scientists disagree about how much and for which sports; the IOC left it to each federation; many federations now restrict by puberty.
    • Most Americans want birth-sex categories69% in Gallup's 2025 poll, including 42% of Democrats.

    The myth

    • "Men"The athletes in question are transgender girls and women, most of whom transitioned before or during puberty and compete under hormone rules.
    • "Taking over"Fewer than ten of 510,000 college athletes; a handful of high school cases nationally; one Division I title in NCAA history.
    • The Olympic boxerImane Khelif, the Algerian boxer called a man by Trump and others in 2024, was born female, raised female and has a female passport. She is not transgender; the IOC said so and no evidence of a sex-development condition was ever produced.
    Dig deeper: the cases, the science, and the laws

    The documented cases

    Lia Thomas swam for Penn's women's team in 2021–22 after three seasons on the men's team and a year of hormone therapy under NCAA rules; she won the 500 free at nationals, placed fifth in the 200 and last in the 100 final. Penn later settled a Title IX complaint with the Trump administration by stripping her records. At the high school level the known cases are counted in ones: AB Hernandez won California's girls' high jump and triple jump in 2025 under a rule change that awarded duplicate medals; a Spokane Valley runner won a 400-meter title in Washington; Maine's governor said the state had two transgender girls in school sports when the administration moved to cut the state's funding over them. Advocacy groups keep lists of trans athletes who placed; the lists are short, and most entries are not champions.

    The science

    Testosterone during male puberty increases height, muscle mass, heart and lung size and bone density. Hormone therapy reduces muscle mass and hemoglobin over one to three years but does not reverse skeletal differences. How much residual advantage remains, and whether it matters in a given sport, is contested in the literature; the honest summary is "some, sport-dependent, and smaller for athletes who never went through male puberty." That argument is about eligibility rules for a handful of people. It does not support the word "takeover."

    The laws

    Idaho passed the first ban in 2020. By October 2026 there were 27 state laws and two agency policies (Alaska, Virginia). The NCAA barred athletes assigned male at birth from women's teams on February 6, 2025, the day after the executive order. On June 30, 2026 the Supreme Court held that Idaho's and West Virginia's laws violate neither the Equal Protection Clause nor Title IX; Justice Kavanaugh wrote that states "may maintain women's and girls' sports for biological females," and Justice Sotomayor's dissent objected that the laws apply even where an individual athlete has no advantage. Voters in Arizona, Colorado, Nebraska and Washington decide ballot measures on the question in November 2026.

    §5 · The claim

    "Letting trans people use the bathroom puts women and girls in danger."

    Men in women's bathroomsThe standard phrasing in 21 state bathroom laws passed since 2021, and in the campaign ads that preceded them.

    The claim has been tested. Massachusetts localities adopted transgender-inclusive restroom rules at different times, which let researchers compare police reports for assault, voyeurism and privacy violations in restrooms before and after, and against similar towns without the rules. There was no change. Incidents of any kind in restrooms were rare everywhere. What the national crime survey does show is who gets hurt: transgender people are victims of violent crime at four times the rate of everyone else.

    No evidence

    The one natural experiment found no effect on safety or privacy incidents. No state that passed a bathroom law has produced data showing the problem it was solving.

    Violent victimization · per 1,000 people, 2017–2018National Crime Victimization Survey via the Williams Institute
    Rape, sexual assault, aggravated and simple assault. Transgender men: 107.5 per 1,000; transgender women: 86.1; cisgender women: 23.7; cisgender men: 19.8. The 2022–23 update put the transgender rate at 93.7.
    0change in restroom assault or privacy incidents after Massachusetts towns adopted inclusive rules, versus matched towns that didn't.Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 2018
    4×the violent-victimization rate for transgender people compared with cisgender people.NCVS, Williams Institute
    21states plus Puerto Rico with bathroom restrictions; nine cover every government building, four make it a crime.MAP, Oct 10, 2026
    70–90%of child sexual abuse is committed by someone the child knows: family, coaches, clergy, family friends. Not strangers in restrooms.Research review, Future of Children

    The kernel

    • Women's restrooms and locker rooms are places where privacy matters and assaults, though rare, do occurEvery such assault is already a crime, by anyone, under every state's law.
    • Some people are uncomfortable sharing facilities with transgender peopleDiscomfort is real; the laws are sold as safety, which is a different claim.

    The myth

    • That inclusive rules increase assaults or voyeurismThe Massachusetts study found no effect.
    • That predators use trans-inclusive rules as coverNo documented pattern; a man entering a women's restroom to assault someone was illegal before and after.
    • "Groomers"Drag story hours, Pride events and transgender teachers have never been linked by any dataset to abuse; the overwhelming majority of abusers are family members and trusted adults of the child's own community.
    Dig deeper: the study, and what the laws actually do

    The Williams Institute study (Hasenbush, Flores and Herman, 2018) used Massachusetts, where some cities adopted gender-identity public accommodation ordinances before the 2016 statewide law. It matched those localities to similar ones without ordinances and compared police reports of assault, sex crimes, voyeurism and other privacy violations in restrooms and locker rooms before and after. The passage of the ordinances "is not related to the number or frequency of criminal incidents in these spaces." Such incidents were rare in all localities. The authors note the obvious limit: it is one state and the incidents are too rare to detect small effects. It remains the only controlled test anyone has run, because no state passing a bathroom law has commissioned one.

    The laws themselves range widely. Three states cover K-12 schools only; nine cover schools and some government buildings; nine, plus Puerto Rico, cover every government-owned building including universities; four make using the "wrong" facility a crime in some circumstances, and Idaho's 2026 law made it a felony. What they share is an enforcement problem: nobody checks, so in practice they are enforced by other users' suspicion, which falls on anyone who looks gender-nonconforming, including cisgender women. The one measurable effect in the data is on transgender people, who report avoiding public restrooms, and whose victimization rate is four times the average.

    §6 · The claim

    "Mass shooters are disproportionately transgender."

    Trans/NB (Bio Male)Top line of a chart of "mass shootings per million" that went viral on X in late August 2025 after the Minneapolis church shooting, amplified by Donald Trump Jr. among others. No organization that tracks shootings produced it; the Gun Violence Archive's director said he had "no idea" where its numbers came from.

    The Violence Project, the most-used database of mass shootings, counts 200 shooters from 1966 to 2024. One was transgender. One hundred and ninety-two were men. The Gun Violence Archive, using a broader definition that counts any shooting with four or more people hit, has about 5,750 incidents since 2013 and five confirmed transgender shooters, under 0.1%. Transgender people are about 1% of Americans 13 and older. By either database they are underrepresented among shooters, and men, at 96%, are the group that is not.

    False

    The viral chart had no source. Every real database shows the same thing: mass shooters are overwhelmingly men, and transgender shooters are a rounding error below their population share.

    Mass shooters, 1966–2024 · 200 shooters in 195 shootingsThe Violence Project
    The Violence Project counts public shootings with four or more killed. The one transgender shooter is the 2023 Nashville case, which the FBI's own active-shooter report lists as "female/transgender male"; the other 48 active shooters in that FBI report were men.
    96%of mass shooters were men. Women: 3.5%. Transgender: 0.5%.The Violence Project
    ~1%of Americans 13 and older identify as transgender, about 2.8 million people.Williams Institute, Aug 2025
    5 of 5,748Gun Violence Archive incidents, 2013 to Sept 2025, with a confirmed transgender shooter.GVA
    0sources cited by the viral chart. FactCheck.org, PolitiFact and Lead Stories all traced it to nothing.Aug–Sep 2025
    Dig deeper: why the claim recurs

    The claim surfaces after specific shootings: Nashville in March 2023, Minneapolis in August 2025, and a British Columbia shooting in February 2026, each involving a perpetrator identified in reporting as transgender or nonbinary. Three cases in three years feel like a pattern to anyone who hears about them and never hears about the other 190. That is the mechanism of most of the claims on this page: a vivid case, a category, and no denominator. The denominator here is well documented. Of 200 Violence Project shooters, 192 were men who were not transgender; the FBI's 2023 active-shooter report listed 49 shooters, 48 of them men. Ohio State criminologist Laura Dugan's summary: relative to their population share, transgender people appear underrepresented. Several databases, including the AP/USA Today/Northeastern count, do not record gender identity at all, which is one reason the viral chart could not have been built from them.

    §7 · The claim

    "Most of them regret it and detransition."

    Here come the detransitioner lawsuitsA recurring framing in opinion pages and state legislative hearings since 2023, where individual detransitioners have testified in support of bans.

    Regret is real and the people who experience it deserve to be heard. It is also uncommon by every measure anyone has taken. Pooling 27 studies of 7,928 surgical patients, regret ran about 1%. Across the studies of adolescents on hormones, between 1.6% and 9.8% stop, and between 1% and 7.6% stop puberty blockers. The largest survey of people who detransitioned found that 82.5% cited an outside reason, pressure from family, harassment, losing a job, trouble getting care, rather than a change in identity. The numbers are contested at the edges, mainly over who drops out of studies, but no study supports "most."

    Mostly false

    Detransition exists and the research on it is thinner than it should be. "Most" is not supported by any study; the range runs from about 1% for surgical regret to under 10% for stopping hormones, and most who stop cite pressure rather than regret.

    How many stop or regret · range of published estimatesBustos 2021; J. Sexual Medicine review 2025; Turban 2021
    Bars scaled to 50% except the last two. The 13.1% figure is from the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey of 27,715 adults and includes temporary detransition; of those, 15.9% cited an internal reason such as a change in identity. Critics note that regret studies lose patients to follow-up, which could understate rates; a UK clinic study with that caveat still found 6.9%.

    The kernel

    • Some people detransition and some regret treatmentTheir testimony has shaped laws in several states and lawsuits against providers. Their numbers are small but not zero.
    • Long-term follow-up is weakClinics lose track of patients; the "1%" figure comes from those who stayed in contact. The honest range for adolescents stopping hormones is single digits, with uncertainty.

    The myth

    • "Most"No study, including those by critics of the care, finds a majority.
    • That detransition equals regretMost who stop cite family pressure, harassment or cost; many later resume.
    • That surgery is commonly regrettedAbout 1% across 27 studies, lower than most elective surgeries.
    Dig deeper: what the studies measure

    Three different things get called "detransition." Regret is a stated wish not to have had treatment. Discontinuation is stopping medication, for any reason, including cost, side effects, pregnancy plans or reaching a desired point. Identity change is ceasing to identify as transgender. The 2021 meta-analysis of surgical regret (Bustos et al.) pooled 7,928 patients and found about 1%, with wide confidence intervals and the authors' own warning about inconsistent definitions; a published rebuttal argued one included study's sample was overstated. A 2025 systematic review of discontinuation found adolescent hormone discontinuation ranging from 1.6% to 9.8% across studies and blocker discontinuation from 1% to 7.6%. The 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey found 13.1% of respondents had detransitioned at some point, 82.5% of them citing at least one external reason; a separate survey recruited from online detransitioner communities found the opposite emphasis, with 70% citing a realization that their dysphoria had other causes. Both are self-selected samples. The fair reading is that detransition is a minority outcome measured in single-digit percentages, that the people who experience it are poorly served by both sides of the argument, and that nobody has the long-term data that would settle it.

    §8 · The claim

    "Democrats support abortion up to birth, and even after."

    Execution after birth.Donald Trump, presidential debate, September 10, 2024, about Minnesota and its governor. The moderator corrected him on air: "There is no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it's born." Ron DeSantis made a similar claim in 2023; PolitiFact rated it False.

    Killing a newborn is homicide in all fifty states and always has been. No bill anywhere proposes otherwise. The "after birth" claim grew out of laws in a few states that let families decline aggressive intervention for infants born with conditions that will kill them within minutes or hours, which is palliative care, not abortion. The "up to birth" half has a kernel: ten states and the District of Columbia set no gestational limit in law. But the thing the phrase conjures, healthy late-term pregnancies ended on request, is not what happens. The CDC's count: 1.1% of abortions occur at 21 weeks or later, and those are overwhelmingly fetal anomalies and threats to the mother's life.

    False

    "After birth" is false everywhere. "Up to birth" is legally possible in ten states and DC and describes about 1% of abortions, nearly all medical emergencies, which is why the phrase is a myth even where the statute is real.

    When abortions happen · share by weeks of gestation, 2022CDC Abortion Surveillance, 41 reporting areas
    613,383 abortions were reported to the CDC for 2022; 78.6% occurred at nine weeks or earlier and 92.8% by thirteen weeks. 53.3% were medication abortions. The 1.1% at 21 weeks or later is about 6,700 cases nationally, concentrated in diagnoses of fatal fetal conditions and maternal health crises.
    50states where killing a newborn is a crime. The number of states where it is legal: zero.Every state homicide statute
    10 + DCjurisdictions with no gestational limit in law, after Massachusetts removed its 24-week line in August 2026.KFF; Mass. law, Aug 10, 2026
    1.1%of abortions at 21 weeks or later. 92.8% happen in the first 13 weeks.CDC, 2022 data
    FalsePolitiFact's rating of the "post-birth abortion" claim, 2023 and 2024.PolitiFact

    The kernel

    • Ten states and DC have no gestational limitAlaska, Colorado, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont. Most Democrats in Congress support codifying Roe, which allowed limits after viability.
    • Some states repealed "born-alive" statutesMinnesota in 2023 replaced a requirement to resuscitate with a requirement for care "consistent with good medical practice," which allows comfort care for infants who cannot survive.

    The myth

    • "Execution after birth"Illegal in every state; no law or bill allows it.
    • That late abortions are common or elective1.1% after 21 weeks, requiring a specialist, usually after a diagnosis that the fetus will not survive.
    • "Democrats" as a blocDemocratic-led states range from no limit to viability limits; the party's federal bill restored Roe's viability framework.
    §9 · The claim

    "They're eating the pets. Immigrants are driving crime."

    In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats.Donald Trump, presidential debate, September 10, 2024. Springfield's city manager, police chief, mayor and county commission president said there was no evidence. The woman whose missing cat started one rumor found it in her basement and apologized to her Haitian neighbors.

    The Springfield story was false the day it was told and has stayed false through every attempt to revive it; the one later animal-cruelty case cited as vindication involved a woman who was neither Haitian nor from Springfield. The larger claim behind it, that immigrants commit more crime, is the rare political claim that has been tested against hard records, because Texas logs the immigration status of everyone it arrests. The result is the same every year: undocumented immigrants are arrested and convicted at lower rates than people born here, and legal immigrants at lower rates still.

    False

    No pets. And in the only state that keeps the records, immigrants of every status are arrested, convicted and imprisoned less often than the native-born.

    Incarceration rate · per 100,000 people, 2024Cato Institute from Census microdata, March 2026
    Native-born Americans are incarcerated at roughly twice the rate of undocumented immigrants and four times the rate of legal immigrants. The Texas arrest data (Light, He and Robey, PNAS 2020) found undocumented immigrants had about half the violent-crime arrest rate of U.S.-born citizens and a quarter the property-crime rate, 2012 to 2018, with the gap holding for convictions.
    0credible reports of pets harmed by immigrants in Springfield, per the city, police and county. The "evidence" later cited was a police report stating there was no evidence.Springfield, Ohio, 2024–25
    45%lower felony conviction rate for undocumented immigrants than for U.S.-born Texans.PNAS, 2020, Texas DPS records
    52%of Trump voters said the pet claim was definitely or probably true in a post-debate poll. 57% of Ohio voters said it was false.YouGov; Washington Post, Sept 2024
    2 statesrecord immigration status in criminal records: Texas and Georgia. Both show the same lower rates. Everywhere else, the claim cannot even be checked.Cato

    The kernel

    • Springfield's Haitian population grew fast, to an estimated 15,000 in a city of 58,000Housing, schools and clinics were strained; the strain was real and the city said so. The pets were not.
    • Individual immigrants commit crimes, some of them horrificEvery group's members do. The question the claim makes is about rates, and the rates run the other way.

    The myth

    • Anyone eating anyone's petOne missing cat, found in the owner's basement. One stolen-geese report the county found no evidence for.
    • "Driving crime"Undocumented: about half the native-born rate. Legal immigrants: about a quarter.
    • "Migrant crime wave"Violent crime fell nationally in 2023, 2024 and 2025 during the largest immigration surge in decades.
    §10 · The claim

    "Millions of noncitizens are voting."

    Noncitizens are voting in our elections in massive numbers.The premise of the SAVE Act and of state "citizenship audits" in 2024 to 2026. The audits are the best evidence against the premise.

    States that went looking found what every previous search found. Georgia checked 8.2 million registered voters in 2024 and found 20 noncitizens, nine of whom had ever voted, most before 2012. Michigan found 15 possible noncitizen ballots among 5.7 million cast. Utah reviewed two million registrations over a year and found 27 noncitizens registered. In thirty years of federal prosecutions, 129 people have been charged with voting as a noncitizen and 73 convicted. The crime carries prison and deportation, and the data show it is attempted at a rate of a few per million.

    False

    Every audit, including those run by Republican secretaries of state who expected to find fraud, found cases in the dozens against voter rolls in the millions.

    Noncitizens found · per million voters checkedState audits, 2024–2026
    Georgia: 20 of 8.2 million registrants, nine of whom had voted. Michigan: 15 potential noncitizen ballots of 5.7 million. Utah: 27 noncitizen registrations (not votes) of 2 million. Texas referred 117 cases for investigation in September 2026 out of 18 million registrants; referrals from database flags typically shrink on review because the federal citizenship database is out of date for naturalized citizens.
    73federal convictions for noncitizen voting in 30 years, from 129 people charged.Reuters analysis, 2026
    30suspected noncitizen votes referred for investigation across 42 jurisdictions that counted 23.5 million ballots in 2016.Brennan Center
    2.4per million: Georgia's 2024 audit result. A 0.0002% rate.Georgia Secretary of State
    Jun 2026A federal court ruled the government's revised citizenship database could not lawfully be used to purge voter rolls, after flags proved to include naturalized citizens.Center for Election Innovation tracker

    The kernel

    • Noncitizens have occasionally registered and votedDozens per state over decades, usually green-card holders confused at the DMV. It is a felony and they are prosecuted.
    • A few cities let noncitizens vote in local electionsSan Francisco school board; some Maryland and Vermont towns. Never federal or state races, where it is illegal everywhere.

    The myth

    • "Millions," "massive," "swinging elections"The largest audit in the country found 20 people. The 2016 presidential margin in Georgia was 211,000 votes; in 2024, 115,000.
    • That audits are suppressedRepublican officials in Georgia, Ohio, Texas and Utah ran them and published them. The numbers are above.
    §11 · The map

    What the myths built.

    Fewer than ten college athletes, 85 surgeries a year, zero litter boxes and no measurable bathroom risk produced, between 2020 and 2026, seventy-seven state laws and policies: 27 bans on medical care for transgender minors, 29 bans on transgender girls in school sports, and 21 bathroom restrictions. Switch layers to see where each applies. Half of American transgender teenagers now live where all three are law.

    MAP · Oct 10, 2026
    Source: Movement Advancement Project equality maps, data as of October 10–11, 2026. Care bans: 27 states plus Puerto Rico (Arizona's covers surgery only; Montana's is permanently blocked and Kansas's temporarily). Sports bans: 27 state laws plus agency policies in Alaska and Virginia. Bathroom laws: 21 states plus Puerto Rico. Tiles are a cartogram.
    48%of transgender 13-to-17-year-olds live in a state that bans their medical care.MAP
    53%live in a state that bans them from school sports matching their identity.MAP
    37%of transgender people 13 and older live in a state with a school bathroom restriction.MAP
    62%of Americans oppose laws banning gender-affirming care for minors, even as 69% favor birth-sex sports categories. The public distinguishes the claims; the laws arrived as a bundle.Gallup, 2024 and 2025
    §12 · The pattern

    One vivid case, one category, no denominator.

    Every claim on this page is built the same way. Take something that happened once, or never: a litter bucket, a swimmer, a missing cat, a chart with no source. Attach it to a category of people. Leave out the number that would show how rare it is. The listener fills in the rest, because a story about one child is more vivid than a table with 22.8 million in it. The correction, when it comes, is a denominator, and denominators do not travel.

     
    The vivid case
    The denominator
    Litter boxes
    A bucket of cat litter in a Colorado lockdown kit
    0 litter boxes for students in 13,000 school districts
    "Mutilation"
    A 17-year-old's chest surgery
    85 surgeries among 22.8 million insured minors; 0 under 13
    Sex changes at school
    A district that didn't tell a parent about a new name
    0 schools, ever, providing medical care
    Women's sports
    Lia Thomas's 500-yard freestyle, 2022
    Fewer than 10 of 510,000 NCAA athletes
    Bathrooms
    A hypothetical predator
    No change in incidents in the only controlled study; trans people victimized at 4× the rate
    Shooters
    Nashville, 2023
    1 of 200 mass shooters; 192 were men
    Regret
    A detransitioner's testimony
    ~1% surgical regret; 1.6–9.8% stop hormones
    "Post-birth"
    A comfort-care law for infants who will not survive
    0 states where infanticide is legal; 1.1% of abortions after 21 weeks
    Pets and crime
    A missing cat in Springfield
    Immigrants incarcerated at half to a quarter the native-born rate
    Noncitizen voting
    A green-card holder who voted in 2008
    20 of 8.2 million in Georgia; 73 federal convictions in 30 years

    Who took it back

    Retractions are rare and worth recording. Nebraska State Senator Bruce Bostelman apologized on the floor the same day in March 2022. Maine congressional candidate Ed Thelander said he "doesn't believe it now" in October 2022. Joe Rogan said three weeks after repeating the litter-box story that there was no proof. Tony Dungy deleted his tweet and apologized in January 2023. NCAA president Charlie Baker, asked under oath, gave the real number. The woman in Springfield whose cat was in her basement apologized to her neighbors. The pattern among those who retracted: they were asked for a school, a name, a case, and looked.

    How to check a claim in five minutes

    • Ask for the denominatorOut of how many? A number without one is a story, not a rate.
    • Ask who countedInsurers, the CDC, state auditors and crime surveys count. A chart with no source counts nothing.
    • Ask for the school, the case, the nameEvery litter-box claim died at this step.
    • Separate the policy from the claimYou can favor birth-sex sports categories and still know the number is under ten. You can oppose blockers and still know it is zero under 12.
    • Notice the categoryWhen a claim is about what "they" do, the data are usually about what one person did.

    What the claims have in common

    • Each names a vulnerable group of children as either victims or threats
    • Each arrived in an election year2022, 2024 and 2026.
    • Each produced laws before it produced evidence77 state measures; one controlled study, which found nothing.
    • Each is unfalsifiable by design"Somewhere," "they," "people are saying." The denominator is the only reply.
    The honest version.

    There are real debates inside these topics: how to weigh thin evidence for adolescent hormones, how to write eligibility rules for a sport, what a school owes a parent, where a gestational line belongs. Those debates deserve arguments. What they have gotten instead is a litter box. This page is not a position on any of them. It is the number you need before you can have one.